logo

Tuesday 16th of September 2014

 

Follow us on facebookSubscribeContact MTZ

 


Home Church Why Primitive Baptists Practice Closed Communion
Why Primitive Baptists Practice Closed Communion PDF Print E-mail
Written by Wayne Crocker   
Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:04

 

Many denominations practice open communions of one form or another. Some make communion available to any and all who wish to participate. Others place some restrictions, but still allow those of other denominations to join with them in the service.

Primitive Baptists are sometimes criticized for our practice of closed communion. We invite only those who are members of our local church and other Primitive Baptist churches in fellowship with us to participate in this ordinance of the church.

 

Let me emphasize again that we do not do this because of a "holier than thou" feeling. We believe there are many good people who are following the Lord Jesus Christ in the best way they know, who do not understand some of the fundamental truths held by Primitive Baptists. They are blessed of God as they endeavor to follow Jesus according to the light or knowledge they have.

 

Yet, there are significant differences between what they believe and practice and what Primitive Baptists believe the scripture teaches. If this were not true there would be no point in having demominational distinctions. We would all be one body.

 

There is no place where unity or oneness is more important than at the communion table. Even in a local church, if there are divisions or differences among the membership that are significant, the church should postpone communion until unity can be restored. There would certainly be no such unity of other beliefs. Amos 3:3 teaches that two cannot walk together except they be agreed.

 

Completely open communion would not even require baptism of any kind. But, communion that would allow those who have been baptized into other denominations to participate is still considered open communion. We do not believe the scriptures permit us to engage in communion with those of other denominations. To do so would be to recognize their baptisms as valid, there is no need for seperate bodies of religion. Can you imagine anything more confusing than having Primitive Baptists, Southern Baptists, Methodists, and Pentecostals all trying to worship the Lord together?As mentioned in last months article, we know that only baptized believers were able to participate in communion. "The first communion included Jesus and the apostles, all having been baptized. 1 Corinthians 10:16-17 and 11:20-30 show this service is observed by the church-the church being composed by baptized believers (Acts 2:41-47)."

 

Paul rebukes the church at Corinth for the way they were attempting to carry on communion. The first problem was that there were divisions and heresies among the church as they came together (1 Corinthians 11:18-19). Due to this and other attitudes, Paul lets them know that what they are engaging in is not communion: "When you come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's Supper" (1 Corinthians 11:20). The "therefore" refers back to the divisions and heresies that existed among the membership. Those who hold differing views on some of the basic doctrines of the Bible are not able to come together to eat the Lord's Supper.

 

The church must not allow those who practice certain sins to remain in fellowship and engage in communion. Paul writes: "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one not to eat" (1 Corinthians 5:11). The phrase "not to eat" would certainly include the Lord's Supper.

 

The church is not to pass public judgement on individuals who are not of the church body in the above matters, but only within the church membership. This is another reason why the Primitive Baptists cannot scripturally engage in communion with those who are members of various denominational churches.

 

The Primitive Baptists open their communion to all repentant sinners who want to be a part of the church body by being scripturally baptized in water into the fellowship of the church. The scriptures will not allow us to do more.

 

Yours in hope,

 

Elder Wayne Crocker
 

Comments  

 
-1 #1 Ray Whittington 2011-09-26 20:46
You seem to have overlooked 1 Cor, 11.28 which very clearly states that a man should examine himself carefully before taking of the bread and the cup. Only he and God know if he is worthy. It is not up to any member of any church to make that judgement. For a member or a group of people make such judgement, that in itself is a sen. Judge not lest yea be judged.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 bwinslett 2011-09-27 07:14
1 Cor 11 is in reference to church members. The only people who took communion in the Bible were baptized disciples. That is our example. We are not being judgemental by barring non-members from communion, we are only trying to keep the ordinances as they were delivered us.

By the way, what do you make of 1 Cor 11:31, which speaks in the context of a church being judged for disrespecting communion: For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.

You must take scripture in its context.
Quote
 
 
+1 #3 jwhorn 2011-12-22 21:08
this is not closed communion this is close communion how do you dicipline a member of another assembly even if they are prmimitive baptist the lords supper is a church ordinance given to each local assembly by not keeping to CLOSED communion your taking the first step to universal church
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh



 


Copyright 2003-2010 - Marchtozion.com | Sitemap